Loose ends

There's an article on Slate saying that Bush's Dred Scott comment was a code word to the religious right. I googled it and it checks out. So while he was sitting there saying he had no litmus test for judges, he was saying to the Fundies(my sweet nickname for the Chritian fundamentalists, the phrase is coined, go forth and spread it) that he had a litmus test for judges. This guys a real piece of work, that's some leadership.
On the leadership topic, this is starting to bug me. If you've ever worked you've had a boss who didn't know what the hell he was doing. You or someone else at work probably eventually went up to him and nicely suggested the right way to do something and he ignored it. Suggestions would get more forceful and assertive as the problems at work got worse and worse. Eventually one employee would mouth off bad enough to get fired. Nobody would have ever called the boss a good leader. You call that kind of a boss a dipshit, and then the employees steal anything that's not nailed down. Why don't people apply the same kind of thinking to the president. He's done a shit job (1000 dead and loss of control of 4 provinces in Iraq), he's not listening to anyone (repeatedly said he hasn't made any mistakes), and the company is getting ripped off like mad (Halliburton and KBR). The American public keeps saying he's a good leader. What the hell. This guy is our idiot boss. Since we can't quit and go work for the competition we need to get rid of the boss. Speaking of that some people told me to remind you to vote on my blog, like you're not smart enough to figure that out on your own. Anyway I've said it, now y'all get to it. If you need help here's their website.